A Proposed Protective Protocol Predicting Reduction of Shunt Infection

Abstract

To identify the best protective interventions against shunt infection and, hence, to find an appropriate protocol assumed to be associated with reduction of infection rates. A combined prospective-retrospective cohort study was conducted over a period of 5 years in 3 referral hospitals. Twelve interventions against infection practiced by blinded surgeons during ventriculoperitoneal shunt operations were surveyed and their association with the outcome of interest (i.e., shunt infection) was tested. Interventions proved to be associated with the outcome entered a multivariate logistic regression to identify the protective interventions. Among a total of 392 cases, shunt infection was diagnosed in 11.5% with a median onset of 55 days. Patients' demographics, etiology of hydrocephalus, shunt-related factors, and type of preoperative antibiotics were not associated with shunt infection. Two-thirds of infected shunts revealed Staphylococcus species. Among the tested interventions, double-gloving and device and wound irrigation using vancomycin solution and the use of incision adhesive drapes proved to exhibit a significant protective effect against shunt infection, whereas operative time <40 minutes revealed a marginal protective benefit. Shunt infection is a significant complication that occurs early during the first 2 months after surgery. According to the study findings, an appropriate protocol against shunt infection is assumed to be composed of double-gloving, device and wound irrigation using vancomycin solution, and the use of incision adhesive drapes. Reduced operative time had a beneficial effect against shunt infection, although it was of marginal significance in the current study.