A proposed grading system to evaluate the endovascular curability of deep-seated arteriovenous malformations

Abstract

BackgroundAggressive treatment of deep-seated AVMs is paramount because of their high tendency to bleed (or to re-bleed). In the literature concerning endovascular therapy, AVMs of the basal ganglia, the semi-ovale center and the midbrain are always considered as a single entity. In this study, the authors address the anatomical classification of these AVMs and propose a classification that considers factors influencing their endovascular curability. MethodsFrom 1995 to 2013, clinical and angiographic data of cerebral AVMs were prospectively collected. We reviewed data from patients treated for a deep-seated AVM with the goal to distinguish factors that influence the curability and the outcome of these AVMs. Results134 patients (mean age: 28years) were consecutively treated by endovascular techniques. We describe an anatomical classification concerning the exact location of the nidus and distinguish 5 different sub-types (anterior, lateral, medial, posterior and midbrain). Then, we propose a grading system based on statistical analysis of our series to evaluate the curability of a deep AVM. This comprehensive score is calculated with the Spetzler-Martin grade, the location of the nidus, its type, arterial feeders and venous drainage. ConclusionsDeep-seated AVMs may be classified according to their exact location; we can distinguish 5 different sub-types (anterior, lateral, medial, posterior and midbrain). Each group presented different arterial supplies and venous drainage that influenced treatment possibilities. The comprehensive grading system that we propose in this study must be tested in another deep-seated AVMs population.