Abstract

Medical product sponsors are encouraged to include the patient perspective in their medical product development strategy to inform product design, augment regulatory submissions, argue for alternative clinical trial designs, or to support indications in specific patient populations. The goal is to create a patient-focused ecosystem that enables industry to integrate the patient voice throughout the medical product lifecycle. To this end, the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published several guidance documents to provide industry with the expectations and opportunities for conducting patient-focused activities. From an industry perspective, the Center for Devices and Radiologic Health (CDRH) and the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)/Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) patient-focused policies are complementary. The basic tenets promoted in all FDA patient-focused guidance could apply across therapeutic areas. However, there remain differences in these guidance documents across FDA centers, and there is no framework in place to provide industry with consistent recommendations. Without a coordinated patient-focused policy from the FDA, there is the potential for confusion and a lack of consistency among industry and regulatory decision-makers. The objective of this paper was to propose an alternative framework for patient-focused policy at the FDA, which recognizes the potential for different types of patient input to be used across therapeutic areas and medical product types. Further, these policies need to provide greater clarity on how patient input data is used, so that sponsors may navigate the opportunities to use patient input regardless of the FDA center under which their product is regulated. Creating consistent, coherent, and transparent FDA patient-focused policy will encourage sponsors to obtain patient input more often and with greater certainty of the value that these data may have to their medical product strategies.

Highlights

  • Including the patient voice in medical product development and commercialization has never been a greater priority than it is

  • The objective of this paper is to propose an alternative framework for patient-focused policy at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that recognizes the potential for different types of patient input to be used across therapeutic areas and medical product types

  • If current fiscal plans do not allow for the revision or development of the proposed guidance, the FDA has many vehicles available to disseminate a coordinated approach to these issues, including their newly updated website

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Including the patient voice in medical product development and commercialization has never been a greater priority than it is . The objective of this paper is to propose an alternative framework for patient-focused policy at the FDA that recognizes the potential for different types of patient input to be used across therapeutic areas and medical product types. It offers an assessment of the current state of FDA patient-focused regulatory policy, a look at the impact of this policy on the medical products industry, and recommendations for how a coherent patient-focused policy framework can be used to realize the full potential of including the patient voice throughout the medical product lifecycle

A Brief History of Patient Engagement at the FDA
FDA Patient-Focused Policy and Guidance
FDA Patient-Focused Policy
Patient Preference
Benefit-Risk Determinations
Patient Experience
Impact of Current Patient-Focused Policy on Industry
A Proposed Framework for FDA Patient-Focused Policy
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.