A PROPOSED CYCLE MODEL FOR SPATIAL SOLIDARITY AND ITS UNFILLABLE VOID

Abstract

The categorization of buildings based on their form or function—in other words, architectural typology—could be defined as a literal way to comprehend the spaces where humans live as if in a cohesive progression. Despite the mainstream tendency to use canonical categories that account for every architectural feature, one of the most significant aspects of space antagonizes every fixed definition imposed upon it: the void of space that cannot be permanently filled by humans or reduced by mottos or concepts. Suggesting that the abyss of space, which can be seen more clearly in the broader period, necessitates temporal acts of solidarity, this paper focuses on the evoltions of symbiotic relationships among societal objects that play dramatically important roles in the appropriation and sustainability of built environments. Employing logical argumentation as its primary methodology, it leverages models and arguments from seemingly irrelevant disciplines such as literature, philosophy, and architecture. The proposed spatial cycle model, developed to illustrate bifurcations, obstructions, and several life cycles of a space, highlights the need for a temporal symbiotic model.