Abstract
In earlier papers we developed a constructive version of Reiter's default logic; Constructive Default Logic (CDL) which is a default logic in which the fixed-point definition of extensions is replaced by a constructive definition. Constructive extensions have a computational advantage over Reiter's extensions. Reiter's default logic lacks a default proof theory for non-normal default rules, which was already observed by Reiter himself to be a weakness of his logic. In this paper we show that CDL does have a default proof theory.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
