Abstract

PurposeProstatic artery embolization (PAE) is an effective therapy for alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia; however, is not well studied in patients with concurrent prostate cancer (PCa). We demonstrate a proof of concept for PAE before definitive radiation therapy (RT) in patients with PCa. Methods and MaterialsFrom December 2017 to July 2019, 9 patients with PCa underwent PAE for the indication of LUTS from benign prostatic hyperplasia with concurrent PCa. Five received radiation and all follow-ups at our institution and were therefore included in the analysis. Median follow-up was 18 months from the time of PAE. Side effects during radiation were quantified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scoring system. Pre- and post-PAE plans were compared in the 5 patients by performing an isovolumetric expansion of the post-PAE plan (treated plan) equivalent to the measured volume reduction after PAE. Patient 1 (PT-01) and PT-02 had prostate RT alone whereas PT-03, PT-04, and PT-05 had prostate with elective nodal coverage RT. Mean doses to organs at risk were compared between the 2 plans. ResultsThe mean International Prostate Symptom Score reduction after PAE was 13.8 (5.0-30.0; P = .02). The mean prostatic volume reduction after PAE was 23.1% (7.2%-47.7%). There were no Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 (severe) or higher during radiation. Post-PAE plans in PT-01 and PT-02 had on average 23.2%, 39.8%, and 22.9% decrease in mean dose across the bladder, rectum, and penile bulb, respectively, compared with the pre-PAE plans. There were no appreciable differences in dosimetry in PT03, PT-04, and PT-05 who had nodal coverage. There was no biochemical failure in any of the patients. ConclusionsWe demonstrate a proof of concept that PAE is a clinically significant adjunctive therapy for alleviating LUTS and achieving significant volume reduction before RT, resulting in decreased radiation-related toxicity from RT for PCa.

Highlights

  • Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are a significant cause of morbidity and health care expenditure

  • The indication for Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) was for symptomatic improvement of LUTS before definitive radiation therapy (RT) in all cases

  • This study suggests the proof of concept that PAE in men who have LUTS from BPH before definitive RT for

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are a significant cause of morbidity and health care expenditure. The gold standard for moderate-severe LUTS from BPH is transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). PAE is a safe and effective treatment alternative for patients with moderatesevere LUTS from BPH,[10] and may be preferred Prostatic artery embolization (PAE) has recently been well-studied as a minimally invasive alternative to TURP, for patients with “massive” glands (ie, glands > 80 gm).[3,4,5] PAE has been shown to be associated with shorter hospital stays and lower cost when compared directly to TURP, with equivalent clinical outcomes.[6,7,8,9] PAE has been associated with significant prostate volume reduction of up to 40% with decreases in prostatespecific antigen of up to 50%.6 PAE is a safe and effective treatment alternative for patients with moderatesevere LUTS from BPH,[10] and may be preferred

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call