Abstract

(1) Background: Low back disorders are a leading cause of missed work and physical disability in manual material handling due to repetitive lumbar loading and overexertion. Ergonomic assessments are often performed to understand and mitigate the risk of musculoskeletal overexertion injuries. Wearable sensor solutions for monitoring low back loading have the potential to improve the quality, quantity, and efficiency of ergonomic assessments and to expand opportunities for the personalized, continuous monitoring of overexertion injury risk. However, existing wearable solutions using a single inertial measurement unit (IMU) are limited in how accurately they can estimate back loading when objects of varying mass are handled, and alternative solutions in the scientific literature require so many distributed sensors that they are impractical for widespread workplace implementation. We therefore explored new ways to accurately monitor low back loading using a small number of wearable sensors. (2) Methods: We synchronously collected data from laboratory instrumentation and wearable sensors to analyze 10 individuals each performing about 400 different material handling tasks. We explored dozens of candidate solutions that used IMUs on various body locations and/or pressure insoles. (3) Results: We found that the two key sensors for accurately monitoring low back loading are a trunk IMU and pressure insoles. Using signals from these two sensors together with a Gradient Boosted Decision Tree algorithm has the potential to provide a practical (relatively few sensors), accurate (up to r2 = 0.89), and automated way (using wearables) to monitor time series lumbar moments across a broad range of material handling tasks. The trunk IMU could be replaced by thigh IMUs, or a pelvis IMU, without sacrificing much accuracy, but there was no practical substitute for the pressure insoles. The key to realizing accurate lumbar load estimates with this approach in the real world will be optimizing force estimates from pressure insoles. (4) Conclusions: Here, we present a promising wearable solution for the practical, automated, and accurate monitoring of low back loading during manual material handling.

Highlights

  • The trunk inertial measurement unit (IMU) could be replaced by thigh IMUs, or a pelvis IMU, without sacrificing much accuracy, but there was no practical substitute for the pressure insoles

  • These results suggest that commercial wearables that place an IMU on one of these segments are at least monitoring the types of signals that can be correlated with lumbar moments

  • We focused on load monitoring as a key risk factor for low back disorders, but it is worth reminding that sensors like the trunk IMU capture other data such as twisting and trunk acceleration/deceleration, which can be useful and complementary for injury risk assessment

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Physical pain, missed work, decreased productivity, healthcare costs, short- and long-term disability, and psychological distress due to these low back disorders are substantial and persistent burdens on our society. Overexertion injuries are consistent with a fatigue failure process: the weakening and eventual failure of a material due to repeated loading [4,5,6]. When modeling this fatigue failure process, both the number of loading repetitions and the magnitude of loading on the musculoskeletal tissues are important for approximating the cumulative damage to the tissues. There are multiple opportunities to use musculoskeletal loading and fatigue failure insights to understand and reduce the risk of overexertion injuries, such as through ergonomic assessments or continuous, personal monitoring of injury risk

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call