Abstract

The advantages and disadvantages of a new anchor group 2-(1,1-dicyanomethylene)rhodamine (DCRD) in D–π–A dyes for dye sensitized solar cells, compared with the commonly used anchor group cyanoacrylic acid (CA), were firstly investigated through DFT/TDDFT calculations on the dye/(TiO2)48/electrolyte interfacial electronic dynamics. It was found that the dissociative bidentate bridging mode is the most stable adsorption configuration on the TiO2 anatase (101) surface for DCRD. The calculated results indicate that in contrast to dyes with a CA group, the DCRD anchor group-based dye has a red-shifted absorption spectrum, which is beneficial for the enhancement of Jsc. However, the S atom in the DCRD group near the semiconductor surface has strong interactions with I2, which could lead to a higher I2 concentration in the vicinity of the dye-coated TiO2 surface, accelerating interfacial charge recombination. To avoid such shortcomings, a further optimization strategy for DCRD-based dyes was also proposed from a theoretical point of view. More importantly, we anticipate that dyes with the DCRD anchor group could show better performance in iodine-free redox shuttles-based DSSCs, in which the dye–I2 interaction could be avoided.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.