Abstract
To create better aids for everyday surface navigation, people's navigational preferences, habits, experiences, abilities, and route-selection strategies were examined. Self-described good navigators like and use maps, and they differentially value landmarks, such as rivers, railroads, and houses, whereas poor navigators tend not to use maps, prefer verbal instructions, and tend to rate all landmarks as equally valuable for route finding. Routes selected by people with varying degrees of familiarity with an area were compared with routes generated by standard graph-search procedures. A shortest-path, breadth-first route characterized half of the "expert" routes, whereas none of the graph-search procedures matched "intermediate" and "novice" routes. A good predictor of whether people chose a particular road was whether the sum of A + B + C (where A equals the straight-line distance from the start to the road, B equals the distance traveled on the road, and C equals the straight-line distance from the departure point on the road to the destination) did not exceed the straight-line distance between start and destination by more than about 20%.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
