Abstract

BackgroundThis article describes the process used by the authors in developing an implementation intervention to assist VA substance use disorder clinics in adopting guideline-based practices for treating depression. This article is one in a Series of articles documenting implementation science frameworks and tools developed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI).MethodsThe process involves two steps: 1) diagnosis of site-specific implementation needs, barriers, and facilitators (i.e., formative evaluation); and 2) the use of multi-disciplinary teams of local staff, implementation experts, and clinical experts to interpret diagnostic data and develop site-specific interventions. In the current project, data were collected via observations of program activities and key informant interviews with clinic staff and patients. The assessment investigated a wide range of macro- and micro-level determinants of organizational and provider behavior.ConclusionThe implementation development process described here is presented as an optional method (or series of steps) to consider when designing a small scale, multi-site implementation study. The process grew from an evidence-based quality improvement strategy developed for – and proven efficacious in – primary care settings. The authors are currently studying the efficacy of the process across a spectrum of specialty care treatment settings.

Highlights

  • This article describes the process used by the authors in developing an implementation intervention to assist Veterans Affairs (VA) substance use disorder clinics in adopting guideline-based practices for treating depression

  • Substance use depression study This study developed and tested an implementation intervention to assist VA substance use disorder clinics in adopting guideline-based practices for recognizing and treating depression

  • The intervention development process described here is presented as a method to consider when designing a small scale, multi-site implementation study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article describes the process used by the authors in developing an implementation intervention to assist VA substance use disorder clinics in adopting guideline-based practices for treating depression. The multi-disciplinary participatory process involved two steps: 1) "diagnosis" of sitespecific implementation needs, barriers, and facilitators using key informant interviews and observations of program operations; and 2) use of multi-disciplinary teams of local staff and experts in implementation and clinical issues to interpret diagnostic data, and develop and tailor site-specific interventions. This process is best considered a method for use in a diagnostic evaluation of an implementation intervention. The efficacy of the process should be compared to other models for developing health-focused and/ or healthcare system interventions, such as Intervention Mapping [10], Six Sigma [11], Facilitated Process

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call