A problem with clinical T factor in the 8th TNM edition: Prognosis and EGFR mutation status of small sized lung cancers with difficulty to measure the diameter of solid component in part-solid tumor

Abstract

ObjectiveClinical T factors in the 8th TNM classification of lung cancer have a practical problem. In some cases, it is difficult to measure the size of the solid components in part-solid tumors, and the classification of these tumors is controversial. MethodsWe evaluated 590 resected cT1N0M0 stage IA non-small-cell lung cancers based on the 7th edition between 2009 and 2012. Tumor and solid component diameters were measured using thin-section computed tomography (CT). We defined tumors with difficulty in measuring the size of the solid components as lung cancers with scattered or mixed consolidation (LCSMCs). LCSMCs were observed in 79 (13.4%) patients. Other tumors were classified as cTis, cT1mi, cT1a, cT1b, and cT1c, according to the 8th edition. We compared prognosis and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFRm) status of LCSMCs with those of cT1a, cT1b, and cT1c. ResultsThe difference in overall survival (OS) among cT1a, cT1b, and cT1c was significant (5-year-OS: 96.9% vs. 76.8% vs. 65.0%). There was no significant difference in prognosis between LCSCs and cT1a (5-year-OS: 92.4% vs. 96.9%). A significant difference was observed in the frequency of EGFRm between cT1a, cT1b, and cT1c (52.4%, 42.4%, and 29.8%). The incidence of EGFRm in LCSMCs was 54.8% and there was no significant difference between LCSMCs and cT1a. ConclusionsThe prognosis and frequency of EGFRm in LCSMCs were close to those in cT1a. As we cannot measure the diameter of the solid component in subsolid lung cancers, it may be appropriate to classify these tumors as cT1a tumors.