Abstract
A simple alternative formulation of Hershfield's statistical method for estimating probable maximum precipitation (PMP) is proposed. Specifically, it is shown that the published Hershfield data do not support the hypothesis that there exists a PMP as a physical upper limit, and therefore a purely probabilistic treatment of the data is more consistent. In addition, using the same data set, it is shown that Hershfield's estimate of PMP may be obtained using the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution with shape parameter given as a specified linear function of the average value of annual maximum precipitation series and for return period of about 60,000 years. This formulation substitutes completely the standard empirical nomograph that is used for the application of the method. The application of the method can be improved when long series of local rainfall data are available that support an accurate estimation of the shape parameter of the GEV distribution.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
