Abstract

Calibrating for direction-dependent ionospheric distortions in visibility data is one of the main technical challenges that must be overcome to advance low-frequency radio astronomy. In this paper, we propose a novel probabilistic, tomographic approach that utilises Gaussian processes to calibrate direction-dependent ionospheric phase distortions in low-frequency interferometric data. We suggest that the ionospheric free electron density can be modelled to good approximation by a Gaussian process restricted to a thick single layer, and show that under this assumption the differential total electron content must also be a Gaussian process. We perform a comparison with a number of other widely successful Gaussian processes on simulated differential total electron contents over a wide range of experimental conditions, and find that, in all experimental conditions, our model is better able to represent observed data and generalise to unseen data. The mean equivalent source shift imposed by our predictive errors are half as large as those of the best competitor model. We find that it is possible to partially constrain the hyperparameters of the ionosphere from sparse-and-noisy observed data. Our model provides an alternative explanation for observed phase structure functions deviating from Kolmogorov’s five-thirds turbulence, turnover at high baselines, and diffractive scale anisotropy. We show that our model performs tomography of the free electron density both implicitly and cheaply. Moreover, we find that even a fast, low-resolution approximation of our model yields better results than the best alternative Gaussian process, implying that the geometric coupling between directions and antennae is a powerful prior that should not be ignored.

Highlights

  • Since the dawn of low-frequency radio astronomy, the ionosphere has been a confounding factor in the interpretation of radio data

  • Going forward we use Latin subscripts to specify geodesics with origins at an antenna location; for example is used as shorthand for Correspondingly, we introduce the notion of differential total electron content (∆TEC), τikj τik − τkj, (4)

  • We observe that for both ionosphere varieties the discrepancy of a is on the order of a ∼10 km, or a few percent, implying that a can be learned from data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the dawn of low-frequency radio astronomy, the ionosphere has been a confounding factor in the interpretation of radio data This is because the ionosphere has a spatially and temporally varying refractive index, which perturbs the radiofrequency radiation that passes through it. The image-domain effects of the ionosphere can be dependent on the distribution of bright sources on the celestial sphere, that is they can be heteroscedastic. This severely impacts experiments which require sensitivity to faint structures in radio images. Such studies include the search for the epoch of reionisation It is of great relevance to properly calibrate the ionosphere

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.