Abstract

ABSTRACTThe statistical behavior and modeling of scalar dissipation rate (SDR) transport for head-on quenching of turbulent premixed flames by an inert isothermal wall have been analyzed in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes simulations based on three-dimensional simple chemistry direct numerical simulation (DNS) data. It has been found that the density variation, scalar-turbulence interaction, reaction rate gradient, molecular diffusivity gradient, and molecular dissipation terms, i.e., , and , respectively, act as leading order contributors to the SDR transport away from the wall and the turbulent transport and molecular diffusion terms remain negligible in comparison to the other terms. The leading order contributors to the SDR transport have been found to be in a rough equilibrium away from the wall before the quenching is initiated but this equilibrium is not maintained during flame quenching. The predictions of the existing models for the unclosed terms of the SDR transport equation have been assessed with respect to the corresponding quantities extracted from DNS data. No existing models have been found to predict the near-wall behavior of the unclosed terms of the SDR transport equation. The models, which exhibit the most satisfactory performance away from the wall, have been modified to account for near-wall behavior in such a manner that the modified models asymptotically approach the existing model expressions away from the wall.

Highlights

  • The scalar dissipation rate (SDR) plays a key role in the closure of reaction rate and micro-mixing in premixed turbulent combustion (Bray, 1980)

  • The SDR ~εc transport and its modeling in the context of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) have been analyzed for headon quenching of turbulent premixed flame by an inert isothermal wall based on 3D simple chemistry direct numerical simulations (DNS) data

  • It has been found that an increase in u0=SL leads to an increase in the magnitudes of the unclosed terms of the SDR transport equation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

LES of a range of laboratory-scale (Ahmed and Swaminathan, 2014; Butz et al, 2015; Dong et al, 2013; Kolla and Swaminathan, 2010; Langella et al, 2015; Ma et al, 2014; Robin et al, 2010) and industrial (Sadasivuni et al, 2012) configurations, and satisfactory results have been obtained. The initial values of normalized rms turbulent velocity fluctuation u0=SL, the ratio of turbulent integral length scale to thermal flame thickness l=δth for the turbulent velocity field away from the wall are listed in Table 1 along with the corresponding values of Damköhler number Da 1⁄4 lSL=δthu0, Karlovitz number Ka 1⁄4 ðu0 =SLÞ3=2ðl=δthÞÀ1=2, and turbulent Reynolds number Ret 1⁄4 ρ0u0l=μ0, where ρ0 and μ0 are the unburned gas density and viscosity, respectively The results based on full sample size will be presented for the sake of conciseness

Results and discussion
BT 2 ð1 þ
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call