Abstract
Abstract The authors, who are lawyers and law professors, review how a common law court would use principles of civil tort law to decide whether a program of primary prevention would be potentially liable for damages to a person who claims to have been injured by the program. The authors review the basic principles – duty of care, breach of the standard of care, factual and legal causation, and damages – in the context of primary prevention and conclude that any such program has the potential for liability.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
