Abstract

To investigate the effect of the non adrenergic non cholinergic nerve (NANC) and substance P (SP) in allergic rhinoconjunctivitis by observing histamine nasal provocation induced conjunctivitis in guinea pigs. Forty male guinea pigs were randomly divided into five groups with each group consisting of eight guinea pigs. All anesthetized guinea pigs were exposed either to histamine (0.2%, 5 µl) (group B~E) or saline (5 µl, group A) via unilateral nostril. No pretreatment was done in group A and B while pretreatment was done in groups C~E through injection into the unilateral common carotid artery with cholinergic nerve inhibitor (atropine, 1 mg/kg, group C), cholinergic nerve inhibitor plus adrenergic nerve inhibitors (atropine, 1 mg/kg, phentolamine, 1 mg/kg plus Esmolol, 1 mg/kg, group D) and cholinergic nerve inhibitor, adrenergic nerve inhibitors plus SP receptor antagonist (the same treatment with group D plus D-SP 10(-6) mol/L, 1 µl/g, group E), respectively. To assess the ipsilateral conjunctival inflammatory reaction, conjunctiva leakage with Evans blue dye assessments and HE staining of conjunctival tissues were performed. The SP expression in ipsilateral conjunctival tissue in different groups of guinea pigs were assessed by immunofluorescence and RT-PCR. The activity of eosinophils was assessed by eosinophil major basic protein 1 (MBP1) with RT-PCR, meanwhile, the activity of mast cells was assessed by tryptase with RT-PCR. SPSS 17.0 software was used to analyze the data. At 30 min after nasal application of histamine, ipsilateral conjunctivitis was successfully induced as shown by the change of conjunctiva leakage and histology. The content of Evans blue in ipsilateral conjunctival tissue of group A~E was (13.78 ± 2.48), (29.62 ± 3.31), (19.03 ± 1.47), (18.42 ± 2.52), (14.83 ± 2.14) µg/ml, respectively. There was statistically significant difference between group A and B (t = -10.66, P < 0.05), group B and C (t = 7.97, P < 0.05), group C and E (t = 4.51, P < 0.05). PT-PCR assays showed the relative expression of SP mRNA in ipsilateral conjunctival tissues of group A~E was (1.00 ± 0.04), (1.61 ± 0.09), (1.26 ± 0.03), (1.27 ± 0.06), (1.08 ± 0.05), respectively. There was statistically significant difference between group A and B (t = -22.04, P < 0.05), group B and C (t = 12.93, P < 0.05), group C and E (t = 11.85, P < 0.05). The expression of tryptase of ipsilateral conjunctiva was (1.00 ± 0.01), (1.01 ± 0.05), (1.02 ± 0.17), (1.00 ± 0.14), (1.01 ± 0.20), and the expression of MBP1 was (1.00 ± 0.03), (1.02 ± 0.15), (0.94 ± 0.08), (1.01 ± 0.07), (0.98 ± 0.13) in A~E groups. There was not statistically significant difference among five groups (F value was 1.93, 0.57, both P > 0.05). Histamine nasal provocation induced allergic inflammatory response of ipsilateral conjunctiva in guinea pigs. Neural factors including NANC nerves and its medium SP participated this nose-ocular reflex process. These data help to develop a more scientific clinical treatment strategy.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call