Abstract
The axial Mach number distribution of the core flow for model in a transonic wind tunnel is an important index to evaluate the performance of the flow field, which is usually measured by the centerline probe. In order to simulate the incoming flow characteristics without interference, the probe will extend from the support section to the shrinkage section, so the probe usually must has longer inches, more static pressure measuring points and smaller blockage requirements. In order to study the influence of the points of the centerline probe on the uniformity distribution of flow field, a new static pressure probe is designed, which is smaller and shorter than the centerline probe. On the basis of the stability of the flow field, the Mach number distribution of the flow field measured by the static pressure probe which is driven by the moving measuring mechanism. The characteristics of the measured values are studied by wind tunnel test. The results show that: when Ma ≤ 0.95, the overall distribution and value of Mach number obtained by the static pressure probe is basically the same as those obtained by the centerline probe, but some flow field details, which mainly shows that Mach number of the static pressure probe has smaller fluctuation, higher accuracy and better uniformity index.
Highlights
The axial Mach number distribution of the core flow for model in a transonic wind tunnel is an important index to evaluate the performance of the flow field, which is usually measured by the centerline probe
In order to study the influence of the points of the centerline probe on the uniformity distri⁃ bution of flow field, a new static pressure probe is designed, which is smaller and shorter than the centerline probe
On the basis of the stability of the flow field, the Mach number distribution of the flow field measured by the static pressure probe which is driven by the moving measuring mechanism
Summary
图 11 C⁃T / TZ⁃1 试验结果对比( Ma = 1.1) 图 C⁃T / TZ⁃1 试验结果对比( Ma = 1.2) 图 模型区均方根偏差 当 Ma = 0.8 及 0.95 时( 图 10) ,C⁃T 在该测区的 马赫数均方根偏差大于 TZ⁃1 结果,且存在较为明显 002 2 ~ 0.003 0,主要来自 C⁃T 与 TZ⁃1 在风洞中的堵塞度差 异、支撑结构尺寸不同、安装方式以及各自的加工差 异等因素的综合影响。
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Xibei Gongye Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.