Abstract

Management of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) is challenging, mainly because there is no ideal method to prevent its recurrence. Recurrence of moderate to severe IUAs after conventional treatments entails a poorer prognosis in these patients. This study aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of a patented intrauterine stent as a barrier in the treatment of recurrent IUAs with poor prognosis. This was a retrospective, observational study of 13 women with IUAs, admitted to the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from June 2018 to September 2019. After conventional treatments, moderate to severe adhesions were still evident. Then a patented intrauterine stent was used as a barrier to prevent the reformation of adhesions after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis (HA). All cases received a second-look hysteroscopy after 2-3 menstrual cycles. American Fertility Society (AFS) scores were noted for all cases. Menstrual pattern, recurrence of adhesions, and reproductive outcomes were also evaluated. The mean number of previous HA of the 13 patients was 2.7, and mean AFS score after conventional treatments was still 8.7. Before the use of the stent, 46.2% of the patients had amenorrhea caused by IUAs. After using the intrauterine stent as a barrier, the mean AFS score was 1.7. The menstrual improvement rate was 100%, while the rate of resumption of normal menstrual volume was 53.8%. The second-look hysteroscopy revealed a correct position of the stents and no obvious recurrence of IUAs in all cases. After the removal of the stent, the patients were followed up for 2-13 months (mean: 7 months), and no amenorrhea was observed, the recurrence rate of IUAs was 25.0% and one patient got pregnant. Even in the recurrent IUAs patients with very poor prognosis, the patented intrauterine stent has been proved to be very effective in preventing the recurrence of adhesions, on condition that its correct position inside the uterine cavity is achieved. Due to the extremely poor nature of the studied population, the recurrent rate of IUAs and pregnancy rate after the removal of the stent is still discouraging, although the improvement in menstruation is inspiring.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call