Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify, using eye-tracking technology, if readers on the autism spectrum (AS) would exhibit longer mean fixation times during question-answering but similar levels of comprehension accuracy to typically developing (TD) individuals.MethodsThe eye-gaze behavior of two school-aged autistic children and two TD children with similar reading abilities, age, gender, and grade level, was tracked while they read age-appropriate passages and answered related comprehension questions.ResultsBoth participants on the AS displayed longer mean fixations than TD participants during question-answering. Despite the longer fixations during question-answering, the accuracy of the participants on the AS was equal to or superior to those of the TD participants.ConclusionsLonger mean fixation durations during question-answering did not result in lower reading comprehension scores.

Highlights

  • Following ethics approval and informed parental consent, participants were selected based on their scores on the Progressive Achievement Tests in Reading (PAT-R), an Australian-based test of reading comprehension and word knowledge

  • Students who were considered to be typically developing and of similar age, grade level, gender, word reading, and language skills were included as a form of comparison

  • JG was accurate in answering comprehension questions (JG = 32/46 marks = 70%; SM = 32/46 marks = 70%) despite the difference in eye-gaze behavior

Read more

Summary

Objectives

To identify, using eye-tracking technology, if readers on the autism spectrum (AS) would exhibit longer mean fixation times during question-answering but similar levels of comprehension accuracy to typically developing (TD) individuals. Methods The eye-gaze behavior of two school-aged autistic children and two TD children with similar reading abilities, age, gender, and grade level, was tracked while they read age-appropriate passages and answered related comprehension questions. Results Both participants on the AS displayed longer mean fixations than TD participants during question-answering. Despite the longer fixations during question-answering, the accuracy of the participants on the AS was equal to or superior to those of the TD participants. Conclusions Longer mean fixation durations during question-answering did not result in lower reading comprehension scores. Keywords Autism · Eye-tracking · Reading · Comprehension

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call