A preliminary modeling investigation into the safe correction zone for high tibial osteotomy

Abstract

BackgroundHigh tibial osteotomy (HTO) re-aligns the weight-bearing axis (WBA) of the lower limb. The surgery reduces medial load (reducing pain and slowing progression of cartilage damage) while avoiding overloading the lateral compartment. The optimal correction has not been established. This study investigated how different WBA re-alignments affected load distribution in the knee, to consider the optimal post-surgery re-alignment. MethodsWe collected motion analysis and seven Tesla MRI data from three healthy subjects, and combined this data to create sets of subject-specific finite element models (total=45 models). Each set of models simulated a range of potential post-HTO knee re-alignments. We shifted the WBA from its native alignment to between 40% and 80% medial–lateral tibial width (corresponding to 2.8°–3.1° varus and 8.5°–9.3° valgus), in three percent increments. We then compared stress/pressure distributions in the models. ResultsCorrecting the WBA to 50% tibial width (0° varus–valgus) approximately halved medial compartment stresses, with minimal changes to lateral stress levels, but provided little margin for error in undercorrection. Correcting the WBA to a more commonly-used 62%–65% tibial width (3.4°–4.6° valgus) further reduced medial stresses but introduced the danger of damaging lateral compartment tissues. To balance optimal loading environment with that of the historical risk of under-correction, we propose a new target: WBA correction to 55% tibial width (1.7°–1.9° valgus), which anatomically represented the apex of the lateral tibial spine. ConclusionsFinite element models can successfully simulate a variety of HTO re-alignments. Correcting the WBA to 55% tibial width (1.7°–1.9° valgus) optimally distributes medial and lateral stresses/pressures.