Abstract
A method is proposed for comparing different sets of aspiration levels assigned to goals in a goal programming problem. This is based on the relative flexibilities that are realised under different sets of aspiration levels. The relative flexibility depends upon the relative degree of choosing an objective in presence of other objectives. A pair-wise comparison method in the sense of Shimura has been proposed for measuring the degree of choosing an objective in presence of other objectives. This methodology affords to compare different sets of assigned aspiration levels and thereby choosing the best set as the one with least relative flexibility.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.