Abstract

Neuronal information can be coded in different temporal and spatial scales. Cross-frequency coupling of neuronal oscillations, especially phase-amplitude coupling (PAC), plays a critical functional role in neuronal communication and large scale neuronal encoding. Several approaches have been developed to assess PAC intensity. It is generally agreed that the PAC intensity relates to the uneven distribution of the fast oscillation amplitude conditioned on the slow oscillation phase. However, it is still not clear what the PAC intensity exactly means. In the present study, it was found that there were three types of interferential signals taking part in PAC phenomenon. Based on the classification of interferential signals, the conception of PAC intensity is theoretically annotated as the proportion of slow or fast oscillation that is involved in a related PAC phenomenon. In order to make sure that the annotation is proper to some content, simulation data are constructed and then analyzed by three PAC approaches. These approaches are the mean vector length (MVL), the modulation index (MI), and a new permutation mutual information (PMI) method in which the permutation entropy and the information theory are applied. Results show positive correlations between PAC values derived from all three methods and the suggested intensity. Finally, the amplitude distributions, i.e. the phase-amplitude plots, obtained from different PAC intensities show that the annotation proposed in the study is in line with the previous understandings.

Highlights

  • Neural information can be coded in different scales in brain [1, 2]

  • The phase-amplitude plots show that the annotation is in line with previous understanding of phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) intensity

  • The results show that there is a positive correlation between PAC intensity k and PAC values calculated by the PAC approaches (Figs 3–8)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neural information can be coded in different scales in brain [1, 2]. Continuous electrophysiological signals, recorded at mesoscopic and macroscopic levels, e.g. local field potential (LFP) and electroencephalogram recordings (EEG), show rhythmical characteristics known as neuronal oscillations. They are divided into five interactive frequency bands named delta (14Hz), theta (4-8Hz), alpha (8-12Hz), beta (12-28Hz), and gamma (28Hz-100Hz) oscillations [3,4,5]. Neural oscillations play a fundamental role in learning and memory [4, 6]. PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0163940 October 4, 2016

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call