Abstract

The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) degrades individual proteins in a highly regulated fashion and is responsible for the degradation of misfolded, damaged, or unneeded cellular proteins. During the past 20 years, investigators have established a critical role for the UPS in essentially every cellular process, including cell cycle progression, transcriptional regulation, genome integrity, apoptosis, immune responses, and neuronal plasticity. At the center of the UPS is the proteasome, a large and complex molecular machine containing a multicatalytic protease complex. When the efficiency of this proteostasis system is perturbed, misfolded and damaged protein aggregates can accumulate to toxic levels and cause neuronal dysfunction, which may underlie many neurodegenerative diseases. In addition, many cancers rely on robust proteasome activity for degrading tumor suppressors and cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors necessary for rapid cell division. Thus, proteasome inhibitors have proven clinically useful to treat some types of cancer, especially multiple myeloma. Numerous cellular processes rely on finely tuned proteasome function, making it a crucial target for future therapeutic intervention in many diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, cystic fibrosis, atherosclerosis, autoimmune diseases, diabetes, and cancer. In this review, we discuss the structure and function of the proteasome, the mechanisms of action of different proteasome inhibitors, various techniques to evaluate proteasome function in vitro and in vivo, proteasome inhibitors in preclinical and clinical development, and the feasibility for pharmacological activation of the proteasome to potentially treat neurodegenerative disease.

Highlights

  • Biologists viewed cellular proteins as essentially stable constituents subjected to only minor “wear and tear.” The widely accepted theory was that dietary proteins functioned primarily as energy, providing fuel for the body

  • unfolded protein response (UPR) activation regulates the gene expression involved in protein folding and endoplasmic reticulum– associated protein degradation (ERAD) and decreases protein translation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in an attempt to restore ER homeostasis (Travers et al, 2000)

  • Unlike other proteasome inhibitors that only form a bond with the threonine hydroxyl, the double covalent bond formation of the epoxyketone group limits its reactivity to the N-terminal nucleophile threonine proteases without inhibiting any other cellular protease (Groll and Huber, 2004)

Read more

Summary

A Practical Review of Proteasome Pharmacology

Abstract——The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) degrades individual proteins in a highly regulated fashion and is responsible for the degradation of misfolded, damaged, or unneeded cellular proteins. During the past 20 years, investigators have established a critical role for the UPS in essentially every cellular process, including cell cycle progression, transcriptional regulation, genome integrity, apoptosis, immune responses, and neuronal plasticity. Many cancers rely on robust proteasome activity for degrading tumor suppressors and cell cycle checkpoint inhibitors necessary for rapid cell division. Proteasome inhibitors have proven clinically useful to treat some types of cancer, especially multiple myeloma. Numerous cellular processes rely on finely tuned proteasome function, making it a crucial target for future therapeutic intervention in many diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, cystic fibrosis, atherosclerosis, autoimmune diseases, diabetes, and cancer. We discuss the structure and function of the proteasome, the mechanisms of action of different proteasome inhibitors, various techniques to evaluate proteasome function in vitro and in vivo, proteasome inhibitors in preclinical and clinical development, and the feasibility for pharmacological activation of the proteasome to potentially treat neurodegenerative disease

Introduction
Proteasome Structure and Activity
Proteasome-Dependent Cellular Processes
The Rise of Proteasome Inhibitors
Chemical Classes of Proteasome Inhibitors
Considerations for Proteasome Inhibitor Design
Methods for Pharmacological Proteasome Research
Proteasome Purifications
Monitoring Proteasome Activity
Proteasome Active Site Probes
Hematologic Malignancies
Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitors
Additional Proteasome Inhibitors in Clinical Trials
Immunoproteasome-Specific Proteasome Inhibitors
Novel Combination Therapies
Deubiquitinating Enzyme Inhibitors
Activation of 20S by Gate Opening
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call