Abstract
Purpose To design and validate an indoor mobility course that is sensitive and easy to assemble in a variety of settings. Method Seventy participants were asked to walk twice along a 14 metre indoor corridor containing 16 obstacles, once in each direction. Twenty participants suffered from varying degrees of tunnel vision (TV) due to retinitis pigmentosa (TVPs) and the TV was simulated in the remaining fifty normally-sighted participants (SIPs).The VA, CS and VF were measured. The binocular field of view (FoV) of the TVPs varied from 4° to 21o. The FoV of the SIPs was constricted using goggles and ranged from 4° to 22°. The SIPs repeated the test at a second visit. In each case the time taken to complete the test was expressed as the percentage preferred walking speed (PPWS) and the number of collisions was recorded. Results For the SIPs, the PPWS and the collision scores both showed a significant relationship to FoV on both visits; for PPWS: r = 0.58; r = 0.56; p <0.0001, respectively; for collisions: r = -0.50, r = -0.55, p < 0.0001, respectively. Generally, no significant difference was found between the mobility scores between visits. The FoV of the TVPs was significantly related to their PPWS scores, r = 0.40, p = 0.04. No relationship was found between the TVPs FoV and collision scores. A significant relationship was found between the TVPs’ VA and collisions (r = 0.40, p = 0.03). There was also a moderate but not significant relationship between the TVPs’ CS and collisions. Conclusion This mobility course is relatively short and does not require dedicated space, so could be easily replicated in other studies. The results indicate that this design is valid and that the course is a useful tool for assessing functional performance in tunnel vision patients.
Highlights
The term “mobility” refers in this study to the ability to travel from one place to another safely and independently
The results indicate that this design is valid and that the course could be a useful tool for assessing functional performance in tunnel vision patients
The tunnel vision (TV) participants had been diagnosed with retinitis pigmentosa for at least 15 years and were in the advanced stages
Summary
The term “mobility” refers in this study to the ability to travel from one place to another safely and independently. Suggested methods include assessing the mobility performance in a qualitative (Szlyk, Seiple, et al, 1998; Szlyk, Seiple, Stelmack, & McMahon, 2005) or quantitative approach by using indoor (Black et al, 1997; Leat & Lovie-Kitchin, 2006; Lovie-Kitchin, Soong, Hassan, & Woods, 2010; Soong, Lovie-Kitchin, & Brown, 2001; Turano, Geruschat, Stahl, & Massof, n.d.) and outdoor mobility courses (Haymes et al, 1996; Kuyk, Elliott, & Fuhr, 1998; Szlyk, Fishman, Grover, Revelins, & Derlacki, 1998) with a variety of obstacles, around which the participants must walk quickly (a measure of efficiency) and without errors (a measure of safety). It is usual to specify speed in terms of the percentage preferred walking speed (PPWS), as used in many previous studies (Black et al, 1997; Leat & Lovie-Kitchin, 2008; Lovie-Kitchin, Woods, & Black, 1996; Soong, Lovie-Kitchin, & Brown, 2004). The percentage preferred walking speed (PPWS) is calculated by dividing the walking speed of the seeded route by the walking speed of the un-seeded route (i.e. the PWS)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Scandinavian Journal of Optometry and Visual Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
