Abstract

In electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) dosimetry, solid dosimeter materials such as alanine (AL) or, more recently, lithium formate monohydrate (LFM) are typically used. These materials offer high potential for applications in radiotherapy based on their favorable dosimetric properties. Nevertheless, EPR dosimetry is not widespread in the clinics. This work presents an uncertainty analysis of EPR dosimetry in the dose range from 1 to 70 Gy using a compact spectrometer and applying a practical procedure being suitable for routine use in radiotherapy. The performances of self-pressed LFM pellets and commercial AL pellets are compared side by side.All pellets had a diameter of 4 mm and a height of 2 mm (AL) or 4 mm (LFM). The mean pellet mass was 35.81 mg and 73.81 mg for AL and LFM, respectively. Before irradiation, the pellets were stored for at least 8 weeks at 34 ± 2% relative humidity. For irradiation, the pellets were put inside an airtight capsule. In total, 25 pellets per material were examined. The pellets were irradiated at a temperature of 25 ± 2.5 (2σ) °C to doses of either 1, 5, 20, 50 or 70 Gy (five pellets per dose value and material) by a clinical 6 MV photon beam. Measurement uncertainties were obtained from five independent readouts per pellet within five weeks following irradiation using a benchtop EPR spectrometer. The measurement time of a single readout was restricted to 10 min per pellet. Dose values were derived from EPR signal amplitudes using a specifically developed spectral fitting procedure. Signal fading characteristics were analyzed and taken into account during evaluation.The relative dose uncertainties (1σ) for a single readout at doses ≥ 5 Gy are below 2.8% (AL) and 1.1% (LFM) but increase to 12.3% (AL) and 2.6% (LFM) at 1 Gy. By averaging five independent readouts, the uncertainties at 1 Gy decrease to 2.6% (AL) and 0.8% (LFM).In terms of dose uncertainty, the LFM pellets are superior to the commercial AL pellets owing to their narrower EPR spectrum and approximately doubled mass resulting in higher EPR signal intensities. In case of the LFM pellets, the EPR dosimetry system shows a high level of precision (< 3%) down to 1 Gy being preferable for applications in radiotherapy. The uncertainties can be further decreased by averaging multiple dose values from independent readouts.

Highlights

  • Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is a specific method for the detection of unpaired electron spins and has been extensively applied in radiation research (Lund and Shiotani 2014)

  • In terms of dose uncertainty, the lithium formate monohydrate (LFM) pellets are superior to the commercial AL pellets owing to their narrower electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrum and approximately doubled mass resulting in higher EPR signal intensities

  • EPR spectroscopy can be utilized for dosimetry purposes via quantitative analysis of EPR signal amplitudes resulting from paramagnetic centers induced by ionizing radiation in solid materials (Regulla and Deffner 1982, Ikeya 1993, Anton 2005, ISO/ASTM 51607:2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy is a specific method for the detection of unpaired electron spins and has been extensively applied in radiation research (Lund and Shiotani 2014). EPR spectroscopy can be utilized for dosimetry purposes via quantitative analysis of EPR signal amplitudes resulting from paramagnetic centers (radicals) induced by ionizing radiation in solid materials (Regulla and Deffner 1982, Ikeya 1993, Anton 2005, ISO/ASTM 51607:2013). Solid dosimeters are irradiated and read out on a later occasion (within hours, days or even weeks) featuring a passive, off-line procedure. EPR dosimeter materials should meet the following two basic requirements: i) Persistent radicals are us created via irradiation and ii) the radical concentration increases monotonously with the absorbed radiation dose. EPR dosimetry materials show a linear dependency of the radical concentration on the absorbed dose and low recombination rates, i.e. slow EPR signal fading

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call