A practical approach for extracting the photosystem II (PSII) contribution to near-infrared solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

Abstract

Recent studies have indicated a good potential for using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) to estimate photosynthetic CO2 assimilation. SIF can be emitted by both Photosystem I (PSI) and Photosystem II (PSII), but it is the SIF signals from PSII which are related to photosynthetic carbon fixation. However, since top-of-canopy SIF observations (SIFTOC) always contain contributions from both photosystems, to mechanistically estimate gross primary productivity (GPP) from SIF, it is essential to extract PSII SIF from SIFTOC. Based on the differences in the relative contribution of PSII across different wavelengths, we propose a practical approach for extracting PSII contribution to SIFTOC at the near-infrared (NIR) band (fPSII_760) using measurements of SIFTOC in the red and NIR spectral regions. A leaf-scale concurrent instrument was developed to assess the response of fPSII_760 under varying environments. For winter-wheat leaves, as light intensity increased from 0 to 400 μmol m−2 s−1, fPSII_760 rose from 0.6 to 0.8; with further increase in light intensity to 1800 μmol m−2 s−1, fPSII_760 consistently decreased to 0.65. There was a slight decreasing trend in fPSII_760 with rising temperatures, with values dropping from 0.65 at 15 °C to 0.61 at 40 °C. We found that variations in fPSII_760 are due to changes in the fluorescence yield of PSII, with the two having a positively proportional relationship. We also estimated canopy-scale fPSII_760 for a winter-wheat study site: fPSII_760 varied from 0.61 to 0.83, with a mean value of 0.78 during the peak growing season. A comparison with eddy covariance-derived GPP reveals that GPP estimated with dynamic fPSII_760 was more accurate than that calculated using fixed fPSII_760, with R2 increasing from 0.6 to 0.84. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the link between SIF and photosynthetic CO2 assimilation, paving the way for more effective use of SIF to estimate GPP.