Abstract
Employing the postcolonial paradigm, this paper explores the conduct of violence in a colonial condition and seeks to determine its rationality in The Attack. In colonial states, violence plays a critical role both in the furtherance and perpetuation of colonialism and the resistance of the same. Both the colonizer and the colonized assume some form of legitimacy in their violent acts. In an effort to delegitimize the resistance effort of the colonized, the colonizer often attempts to define and label the oppressed as terrorists griped in unjustified acts of violence. Through a qualitative research design, this study probes how the colonized attempt to rationalize their violence by resisting the cloak of a terrorist therefore assuming the pose of a resistance and freedom fighter. The paper argues that the dispossessed justify their violence as a path towards redemption from the oppressed condition of colonization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.