Abstract

There is no generally accepted positive economic theory of common law change. There are, of course, innumerable economic explanations of particular laws and equilibrium theories that claim that the law in some sense tracks (or fails to track) economic efficiency. Thus, Landes and Posner* claim to have “the” positive theory of law, and this theory is that the law is efficient. However, they do not provide any mechanism explaining why this is so. Blume and Rubinfeld provide a normative theory of the optimal rate of depreciation of precedent, but again no positive theory.g We propose a straightforward remedy for this omission and find a strong parallel in common law to the forces that change statute law, including rent seeking by special interest groups. The major class of economic models attempting to explain legal change are the evolutionary models.“ These models attempted to explain the alleged efficiency of the common law. The ultimate consensus was that the models identified some weak tendency toward efficiency but not enough to provide a basis for the Posnerian claim that the common law is effrcient5

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.