Abstract

Information is increasingly digital, creating opportunities to respond to pressing issues about human populations using linked datasets that are large, complex, and diverse. The potential social and individual benefits that can come from data-intensive science are large, but raise challenges of balancing individual privacy and the public good, building appropriate socio-technical systems to support data-intensive science, and determining whether defining a new field of inquiry might help move those collective interests and activities forward. A combination of expert engagement, literature review, and iterative conversations led to our conclusion that defining the field of Population Data Science (challenge 3) will help address the other two challenges as well. We define Population Data Science succinctly as the science of data about people and note that it is related to but distinct from the fields of data science and informatics. A broader definition names four characteristics of: data use for positive impact on citizens and society; bringing together and analyzing data from multiple sources; finding population-level insights; and developing safe, privacy-sensitive and ethical infrastructure to support research. One implication of these characteristics is that few people possess all of the requisite knowledge and skills of Population Data Science, so this is by nature a multi-disciplinary field. Other implications include the need to advance various aspects of science, such as data linkage technology, various forms of analytics, and methods of public engagement. These implications are the beginnings of a research agenda for Population Data Science, which if approached as a collective field, can catalyze significant advances in our understanding of trends in society, health, and human behavior.

Highlights

  • Developments in information and communications technologies have altered the research capabilities of almost every academic field

  • In a range of sectors, are becoming increasingly digitized and available, with the capacity to link these data at the unit-record level commonplace in many countries [3]

  • Challenge one is achieving a balance between the need for individual privacy and the public good [16,17,18,19,20,21]

Read more

Summary

A Position Statement on Population Data Science

Kimberlyn M McGrail1*, Kerina Jones, Ashley Akbari, Tellen D Bennett, Andy Boyd, Fabrizio Carinci, Xinjie Cui, Spiros Denaxas, Nadine Dougall, David Ford, Russell Kirby, Hye-Chung Kum, Rachael Moorin, Ros Moran, Christine M O’Keefe, David Preen, Hude Quan, Claudia Sanmartin, Michael Schull, Mark Smith, Christine Williams, Tyler Williamson, Grant MA Wyper, and Milton Kotelchuck. Columbia 2Swansea University 3University of Colorado School of Medicine 4University of Bristol 5University of Bologna 6PolicyWise for Children &. Families 7University College London 8Edinburgh Napier University 9University of Calgary 10 University of South Florida 11Texas A&M University 12Curtin University 13Health Research Board, Ireland 14 CSIRO, Australia 15University of Western Australia 16Statistics Canada 17Institute for Clinical Evaluative. Sciences (ICES) 18University of Manitoba, Manitoba Centre for Health Policy 19Australian Bureau of Statistics 20 Public Health and Intelligence, NHS National Services Scotland 21Harvard Medical School

Introduction
Results
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call