Abstract
The Corfu Channel case was the first decision of the ICJ, and the first to concern the use of force. In it the ICJ took a strict view of the new prohibition of the use of force and warned against a policy of force. This warning seems to have been forgotten by some states and commentators in recent years, but it is as important today as it was in 1949. This paper examines recent attempts by states and writers to justify a wide right to use force - in Kosovo (1999), in the doctrine of revived Security Council authorization to use force against Iraq (2003) and in pre-emptive self-defence. In so doing many of them echo the arguments of the UK in the Corfu Channel case. Such wide justifications for the resort to force can be seen as a policy of force; International law and policy do not support such claims.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
