Year-end Sale % OFF 
Abstract
This paper proposes a pluralist approach to visualization of policy discourse. Argumentation support systems have been applied to political decision-making by visualizing the logical and linguistic structure of arguments. It is further needed that, in order to produce a better collective understanding of complex societal problems, such argumentation support systems have the capability of highlighting value conflicts based on different perspectives. The proposed methodology extracts those lines of arguments which are mutually exclusive but nevertheless each worth exploring. It has been applied to public arguments in a quasi-governmental committee. The paper reports on the outcome of the case study and discusses its implication for socio-technical systems. Language: ja
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
