Abstract

The broader conceptualization of Nachträglichkeit proposed by the author can play an active part in the process of assigning new meaning retroactively (usually through interpretation)—and even giving a meaning, for the first time (usually through construction)—to what the analysand says and cannot say. It gives us a conceptual frame of unconscious psychic temporality with which to explore how psychoanalysis produces psychic change. Winnicott’s “Fear of Breakdown” (1974) is paradigmatic of this broader conceptualization of Nachträglichkeit (see Faimberg 1998).A clinical example is presented (Kardiner 1977) to illustrate why the author believes that her proposal remains true to Freud’s (1937) conception of psychic temporality and construction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.