Abstract
Treatises on epidemic disease by two North American British Colonial literary figures, William Byrd II and Cotton Mather, demonstrate similar preoccupations with epidemics’ religious meanings, despite Byrd’s Anglican and Mather’s Calvinist Congregationalist differing theological commitments. Both men situate epidemic disease in the inherent weakness of the human condition, while Byrd is more inclined toward human reason and Mather toward spiritual intervention in the selection of preventives and treatments. Mather’s role in the 1721 smallpox inoculation controversy may represent competition between Boston’s traditional ministerial intelligentsia and the emerging university-trained medical intelligentsia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
