A Pilot Study of Surgical Trainee Participation in Humanitarian Surgeries

Abstract

BackgroundThe impact of general surgery resident participation on operative case time and postoperative complications has been broadly studied in the United States. Although surgical trainee involvement in international humanitarian surgical care is escalating, there is limited information as to how this participation affects care rendered. This study examines the impact of trainee involvement on case length and immediate postoperative complications with regard to operations in low- and middle-income settings. MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of humanitarian surgeries completed during annual short-term surgical missions performed by the International Surgical Health Initiative to Ghana and Peru. Between 2017 and 2019, procedures included inguinal hernia repairs and total abdominal hysterectomies (TAHs). Operative records were reviewed for case type, duration, and immediate postoperative complications. Cases were categorized as involving two attending co-surgeons (AA) or one attending and resident assistant (RA). ResultsThere were 135 operative cases between 2017 and 2019; the majority (82%) involved a resident assistant. There were no statistically significant differences in case times between the attending assistant (AA) and resident assistant (RA) cohorts in both case types. All 23 postoperative complications were classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade I. In addition, resident assistance did not lead to a statistically significant increase in complication rate; 26% in the AA cohort versus 74% in the RA cohort (P = 0.3). ConclusionsThis pilot study examining 135 operative cases over 2 y of humanitarian surgeries demonstrates that there were no differences in operative duration or complication rates between the AA and RA cohorts. We propose that surgical trainee involvement in low- and middle-income settings do not adversely impact operative case times or postoperative complications.