Abstract

Dead fuel moisture content (DFMC) is a key driver for fire occurrence and is often an important input to many fire simulation models. There are two main approaches to estimating DFMC: empirical and process-based models. The former mainly relies on empirical methods to build relationships between the input drivers (weather, fuel and site characteristics) and observed DFMC. The latter attempts to simulate the processes that occur in the fuel with energy and water balance conservation equations. However, empirical models lack explanations for physical processes, and process-based models may provide an incomplete representation of DFMC. To combine the benefits of empirical and process-based models, here we introduced the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and its combination with an effective physics process-based model fuel stick moisture model (FSMM) to estimate DFMC. The LSTM network showed its powerful ability in describing the temporal dynamic changes of DFMC with high R2 (0.91), low RMSE (3.24%) and MAE (1.97%). When combined with a FSMM model, the physics-guided model FSMM-LSTM showed betterperformance (R2 = 0.96, RMSE = 2.21% and MAE = 1.41%) compared with the other models. Therefore, the combination of the physics process and deep learning estimated 10-h DFMC more accurately, allowing the improvement of wildfire risk assessments and fire simulating.

Highlights

  • Wildfires are crucial to water and carbon cycles on earth [1,2,3,4]

  • If the output of the process-based model along with the variables are used as input of the fuel stick moisture model (FSMM)-Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, the results are the best, with R2 of 0.96, root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.21% and mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.41%

  • If the output of the process-ba9soefd14 model along with the variables are used as input of the FSMM-LSTM model, the results are the best, with R2 of 0.96, RMSE of 2.21% and MAE of 1.41%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wildfires are crucial to water and carbon cycles on earth [1,2,3,4]. On one hand, they emit CO2 into the atmosphere, which may inflict damage to climate [5], air quality [6] and health [7]. DFMC is a function of fuel size and atmospheric conditions [17] It increases or decreases with the change of climate variables through water vapor sorption or desorption until it eventually reaches a stable moisture content, i.e., Equilibrium Moisture Content (EMC) [18]. The combination of the process-based model and the empirical model represents another potential approach for estimating DFMC. To our best knowledge, there are neither deep learning methods nor their combined application with physical process models in estimating DFMC of any size dead fuel. Since approaches based on the combination of physics model and empirical model have shown competitive performance in other areas, their applicability to 10-h DFMC estimation deserves to be tested. All six models were tested on a continuous DFMC dataset

Materials
FSMM Model
LSTM Network
FSMM-LSTM Network
Model Comparison
Random Forest
Model Evaluation
Results
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call