Abstract
We present a general physicochemical sampling model for olfaction, based on established pharmacological laws, in which arbitrary combinations of odorant ligands and receptors can be generated and their individual and collective effects on odor representations and olfactory performance measured. Individual odor ligands exhibit receptor-specific affinities and efficacies; that is, they may bind strongly or weakly to a given receptor, and can act as strong agonists, weak agonists, partial agonists, or antagonists. Ligands interacting with common receptors compete with one another for dwell time; these competitive interactions appropriately simulate the degeneracy that fundamentally defines the capacities and limitations of odorant sampling. The outcome of these competing ligand-receptor interactions yields a pattern of receptor activation levels, thereafter mapped to glomerular presynaptic activation levels based on the convergence of sensory neuron axons. The metric of greatest interest is the mean discrimination sensitivity, a measure of how effectively the olfactory system at this level is able to recognize a small change in the physicochemical quality of a stimulus. This model presents several significant outcomes, both expected and surprising. First, adding additional receptors reliably improves the system’s discrimination sensitivity. Second, in contrast, adding additional ligands to an odorscene initially can improve discrimination sensitivity, but eventually will reduce it as the number of ligands increases. Third, the presence of antagonistic ligand-receptor interactions produced clear benefits for sensory system performance, generating higher absolute discrimination sensitivities and increasing the numbers of competing ligands that could be present before discrimination sensitivity began to be impaired. Finally, the model correctly reflects and explains the modest reduction in odor discrimination sensitivity exhibited by transgenic mice in which the specificity of glomerular targeting by primary olfactory neurons is partially disrupted.
Highlights
Unlike the visual and auditory modalities, the environmental sampling metrics of olfaction remain unclear
We know that our ability to distinguish small changes in color is greater for some colors than for others, and that we can distinguish sounds more acutely when they are within the range of pitches used for speech
In order to measure the resolution of maximum odor discrimination afforded by a given receptor complement within a given environment, we developed a metric for least discriminable differences modeled after principles derived from the spectral overlap of cone sensitivities in the retina [61] and orientation tuning in primary visual cortex (V1; [62,63,64])
Summary
Unlike the visual and auditory modalities, the environmental sampling metrics of olfaction remain unclear. Whereas olfactory sensory transduction per se is straightforward, there is no underlying metric of physical similarity akin to chromatic wavelength, retinotopic spatial proximity, or auditory pitch to provide a quantitative external basis for odor similarity. In lieu of externally defined axes of similarity, these heuristic odor series have been invaluable for exploration of the similarity-dependent computations of the early olfactory system [1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. The transformation between the physicochemical space of an olfactory scene and the activation profile of the primary odorant receptors expressed by an animal sampling that scene has remained essentially undefined
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
