Abstract

AbstractTransient, advective transport of a contaminant into a clean domain will exhibit a moving sharp front that separates contaminated and clean regions. Due to ‘numerical diffusion’—the combined effects of ‘cross‐wind diffusion’ and ‘artificial dispersion’—a numerical solution based on a first‐order (upwind) treatment will smear out the sharp front. The use of higher‐order schemes, e.g. QUICK (quadratic upwinding) reduces the smearing but can introduce non‐physical oscillations in the solution. A common approach to reduce numerical diffusion without oscillations is to use a scheme that blends low‐order and high‐order approximations of the advective transport. Typically, the blending is based on a parameter that measures the local monotonicity in the predicted scalar field. In this paper, an alternative approach is proposed for use in scalar transport problems where physical bounds CLow⩽C⩽CHigh on the scalar are known a priori. For this class of problems, the proposed scheme switches from a QUICK approximation to an upwind approximation whenever the predicted upwind nodal value falls outside of the physical range [CLow, CHigh]. On two‐dimensional steady‐state and one‐dimensional transient test problems predictions obtained with the proposed scheme are essentially indistinguishable from those obtained with monotonic flux‐limiter schemes. An analysis of the modified equation explains the observed performance of first‐ and second‐order time‐stepping schemes in predicting the advective transport of a step. In application to the transient two‐dimensional problem of contaminate transport into a streambed, predictions obtained with the proposed flux‐limiter scheme agree with those obtained with a scheme from the literature. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call