Abstract
Citrus genus includes some of the most important cultivated fruit trees worldwide. Despite being extensively studied because of its commercial relevance, the origin of cultivated citrus species and the history of its domestication still remain an open question. Here, we present a phylogenetic analysis of the chloroplast genomes of 34 citrus genotypes which constitutes the most comprehensive and detailed study to date on the evolution and variability of the genus Citrus. A statistical model was used to estimate divergence times between the major citrus groups. Additionally, a complete map of the variability across the genome of different citrus species was produced, including single nucleotide variants, heteroplasmic positions, indels (insertions and deletions), and large structural variants. The distribution of all these variants provided further independent support to the phylogeny obtained. An unexpected finding was the high level of heteroplasmy found in several of the analyzed genomes. The use of the complete chloroplast DNA not only paves the way for a better understanding of the phylogenetic relationships within the Citrus genus but also provides original insights into other elusive evolutionary processes, such as chloroplast inheritance, heteroplasmy, and gene selection.
Highlights
The genus Citrus comprises some of the most important cultivated fruit trees worldwide
The chloroplast sequences of 34 citrus genotypes were obtained as described in Materials and Methods
This work reports a comparative analysis of the chloroplast genomes of 34 citrus genotypes and presents a comprehensive study of their phylogenetic relationships and divergence time estimations
Summary
The genus Citrus comprises some of the most important cultivated fruit trees worldwide. Phylogenetic studies (Scora 1975; Barrett and Rhodes 1976) agree that most cultivated citrus are derived through hybridization from three true citrus species: Citrus reticulata (mandarins), C. maxima (pummelos), and C. medica (citrons). Further studies supported this hypothesis and some of them have added C. micrantha as a fourth foundational species (Nicolosi et al 2000; Barkley et al 2006; Garcia-Lor et al 2012, 2013; Ollitrault et al 2012). Aside from this general agreement, there are still many discrepancies regarding the phylogenetic relations within the genus Citrus (Scora 1975; Pfeil and Crisp 2008; Bayer et al 2009; Penjor et al 2013)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.