Abstract

This paper is a response to the claim made by some Eυe scholars during a seminar presentation on “The Orthographic Challenges of -na to Learners of Eυe” that the habitual marker, -na of the Standard Eυe, is basically a prolongation of the last vowel of a lexical verb in Tɔηu dialect. The paper examines the habitual marker, -na, in Tɔηu dialect of Eυe. The analysis is performed on data obtained in a face-to-face interview with Tɔηu speakers randomly selected: a collection of speeches from the speakers in various social settings such as markets, churches, homes and funerals in some selected communities of Tɔηu. The study has shown that Tɔηu has four forms: -a, -e, -ε and -ɔ of the habitual marker -na, depending on the kind of sound that ends the lexical verb to which it is affixed. This study revealed four phenomena that bring about these variations; vowel lengthening, labialisation, palatalization and coalition. It is, therefore, evident that Tɔηu does not mark customary action with vowel lengthening only; the assertion above is a misrepresentation of -na in the Tɔηu dialect. The impression that vowel harmony does not exist in Eυe must, therefore, be looked at again.

Highlights

  • The Eυe language, which is the focus of this study, is spoken in Togo, Benin and Ghana

  • We describe the various forms of the habitual marker in the Standard Eυe (SE), to lay a foundation for the discussion

  • The paper examines how the habitual marker -na is realised in Tɔŋu dialect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Eυe language, which is the focus of this study, is spoken in Togo, Benin and Ghana. Awoonor-Aziaku that the Eυe language exhibits distinctive varieties even in very close communities These dialect differences occur in all aspects of the linguistic features of the language: lexis, syntax and phonology. The dialect of the Northern Volta is slightly different from that of the southern part (Ansre, 2000; Ameka, 2008; Aziaku, 2016). This difference is mostly seen in the use of the habitual marker -na, the definite articles la/-a and the progressive markers, “le...m”, etc. A typical example is aɖa in Eυeme and fofoŋ “crystal cane” or “chewing cane” in Aŋlɔ (Ansre, 2000, cited in Aziaku, 2016)

Methodology
Forms of the Eʋe Habitual Marker -na
Typology of the Habitual Marker -na in Tɔŋu
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call