Abstract

14612 Background: Imatinib mesylate (Gleevec, G) is a potent inhibitor of the tyrosine kinases and other signaling mediated events. Preclinical models suggest that G inhibits platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) and stem cell factor (SCF) which are important for prostate cancer growth. This trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of G in PCA pts on HT with stage M0 disease. Methods: Eligible PCA pts included: stage M0 disease with rising PSA levels while on hormonal therapy, no prior chemotherapy. Planned treatment included G 400 mg PO BID given up to a maximum of 12 months. The statistical endpoint for this trial was the% of pts with a ↓ in prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 50% lasting ≥ 4 wks. A 2 stage trial was designed where the study would terminate if the% of pts meeting the endpoint was not convincingly > 30% with 5% chance for error. Pts with a > 50% rise in PSA from baseline were removed from study. Follow-up included monthly toxicities and PSA (specimens frozen/stored until completion of each 3 months of therapy). Results: From 10/1/02–10/11/04, nine pts were enrolled. Pt characteristics included median: age of 67 years (range 52–80), ECOG performance status of 0 (range 0–1), baseline PSA of 29.6 ng/ml (range 2.69–39.52), # prior hormonal manipulations of 3 (1–5). Prior local therapies included: 1 status post (s/p) RP alone, 2 s/p RT alone, 2 s/p neoadjuvant HT plus RP, 2 s/p neoadjuvant HT plus RT. Two pts had no prior local therapy. Two pts had prior salvage RT, 1 had prior palliative RT. Eight of 9 pts evaluable for response and toxicity. One patient never received treatment. None of the pts had a decline 50% decline in PSA level lasting ≥ 4 weeks. Three of 8 pts (38%) had rapid increases in PSA and 4/8 pts (50%) developed metastatic disease after 3 months of therapy. Only one pt completed 12 months of planned therapy. Grade 3/4 toxicities included: fatigue (25%), rash (25%), arthralgias (12.5%), peripheral edema (25%), depression (12.5%), necessitating dose delays and/or discontinuation of G in 4/8 pts (50%). Conclusions: These data suggest significant toxicity and low clinical benefit. Further evaluation of Gleevec in this pt population is not warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call