Abstract

The METTEN study assessed the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of adding metformin to neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). Women with primary, non-metastatic HER2-positive BC were randomized (1:1) to receive metformin (850 mg twice-daily) for 24 weeks concurrently with 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab, followed by four cycles of 3-weekly FE75C plus trastuzumab (arm A), or equivalent regimen without metformin (arm B), followed by surgery. Primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) in the per-protocol efficacy population. pCR rate was numerically higher in the metformin-containing arm A (19 of 29 patients [65.5%, 95% CI: 47.3–80.1]) than in arm B (17 of 29 patients [58.6%, 95% CI: 40.7–74.5]; OR 1.34 [95% CI: 0.46–3.89], P = 0.589). The rate of breast-conserving surgery was 79.3% and 58.6% in arm A and B (P = 0.089), respectively. Blood metformin concentrations (6.2 μmol/L, 95% CI: 3.6–8.8) were within the therapeutic range. Seventy-six percent of patients completed the metformin-containing regimen; 13% of patients in arm A dropped out because of metformin-related gastrointestinal symptoms. The most common adverse events (AEs) of grade ≥3 were neutropenia in both arms and diarrhea in arm A. None of the serious AEs was deemed to be metformin-related. Addition of anti-diabetic doses of metformin to a complex neoadjuvant regimen was well tolerated and safe. Because the study was underpowered relative to its primary endpoint, the efficacy data should be interpreted with caution.

Highlights

  • Metformin, a biguanide derivative that reduces insulin levels, has long been a cornerstone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D)

  • Primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response in the per-protocol efficacy population. pCR rate was numerically higher in the metformin-containing arm A (19 of 29 patients [65.5%, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 47.3–80.1]) than in arm B (17 of 29 patients [58.6%, 95% CI: 40.7–74.5]; odds ratios (ORs) 1.34 [95% CI: 0.46–3.89], P = 0.589)

  • The study closed prematurely with a reduced sample size after 84 of 244 planned patients were randomly assigned: 41 enrolled patients were allocated to the metformin group and 43 patients to the non-metformin group

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A biguanide derivative that reduces insulin levels, has long been a cornerstone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Notwithstanding the limitations of observational studies, many have consistently indicated that metformin can reduce the incidence, outcome, and mortality of BC in patients with T2D [1,2,3]. The extensive clinical experience accumulated from patients with T2D prescribed metformin, together with its well characterized and modest toxicity profile [7, 8], has significantly shortened the clinical evaluation path of metformin in cancer prevention and treatment [9,10,11]. Many clinical studies, including proof-of-principle studies in the prevention setting and phase 2 trials in the adjuvant and metastatic settings, have been planned and/or are currently under way to test the causal nature of the suggested correlation between metformin and clinical benefit in cancer

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call