Abstract

Over the past few decades, AI has been widely used in the field of education. However, very little attention has been paid to the use of AI for enhancing the quality of cross-domain learning. College/university students are often interested in different domains of knowledge but may be unaware of how to choose relevant cross-domain courses. Therefore, this paper presents a personality-driven recommender system that suggests cross-domain courses and related jobs by computing personality similarities and probable course grades. In this study, 710 students from 12 departments in a Taiwanese university conducted Holland code assessments. Based on the assessments, a comprehensive empirical study, including objective and subjective evaluations, was performed. The results reveal that (1) the recommender system shows very promising performances in predicting course grades (objective evaluations), (2) most of the student testers had encountered difficulties in selecting cross-domain courses and needed the further support of a recommender system, and (3) most of the student testers positively rated the proposed system (subjective evaluations). In summary, Holland code assessments are useful for connecting personalities, interests and learning styles, and the proposed system provides helpful information that supports good decision-making when choosing cross-domain courses.

Highlights

  • The use of artificial intelligence for educational purposes has been studied for several years

  • Much research has investigated the links between learning interest and personality, there are currently no methods that cater to cross-domain learning demands

  • This is a significant gap because students often have multiple domain interests

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of artificial intelligence for educational purposes has been studied for several years. In this field, learning and teaching are the two main processes that attract the most research attention. Much research has investigated the links between learning interest and personality, there are currently no methods that cater to cross-domain learning demands. This is a significant gap because students often have multiple domain interests. In single-domain learning, students acquire knowledge from one domain, whereas they learn multiple domains in cross-domain learning

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call