Abstract

The branchial mechanism of urea retention in elasmobranchs was investigated using an in vitro isolated-perfused head preparation, as well as in vivo samples, in the spiny dogfish shark. Both in vivo and in control saline perfusions containing 350 mmol L−1 urea, calculated intracellular urea concentrations in gill epithelial cells were close to extracellular concentrations. Urea efflux to the external water fell only non-significantly, and calculated gill intracellular urea concentration did not change when perfusate urea concentration was reduced from 350 to 175 mmol L−1 with osmotic compensation by 175 mmol L−1 mannitol. However, when the urea analogues thiourea or acetamide were present in the perfusate at concentrations equimolar (175 mmol L−1) to those of urea (175 mmol L−1), urea efflux rates were increased 4-fold and 6.5-fold respectively, and calculated gill intracellular urea concentrations were depressed by about 55%. Analogue efflux rates were similar to urea efflux rates. Previous studies have argued that either the basolateral or apical membranes provided the limiting permeability barrier, and/or that a back-transporter on the basolateral membranes of gill cells is responsible for urea retention. The present results provide new evidence that the apical membrane is the limiting factor in maintaining gill urea impermeability, and raise the prospect that a urea back-transporter, which can be competitively inhibited by thiourea and acetamide, operates at the apical membrane.

Highlights

  • The ability of elasmobranch fishes to retain very high concentrations of the nitrogenous waste urea in their body fluids for the purpose of osmoregulation has fascinated biologists for more than a century (Staedler & Frerichs, 1858; Smith, 1929; Smith, 1936)

  • Overview Overall, the data are consistent with the presence of an active urea back-transporter in the gill cells which is competitively inhibited by the urea analogues thiourea and acetamide

  • Our original hypotheses that the analogues would increase urea efflux rates, would displace urea from the gill cells, and would be excreted at comparable rates to urea when presented at equimolar concentrations in the perfusate were all confirmed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability of elasmobranch fishes to retain very high concentrations of the nitrogenous waste urea in their body fluids for the purpose of osmoregulation has fascinated biologists for more than a century (Staedler & Frerichs, 1858; Smith, 1929; Smith, 1936). Boylan (1967) concluded that the lipid membranes in the gills were of unusual composition, resulting in exceptionally low permeability to urea, a conclusion based largely on changes in urea efflux rate with temperature. There have been only a few studies on the mechanism of urea retention at the gills, all of them on the spiny dogfish Squalus acanthias. He did raise (and dismiss) the possibility of a retention mechanism based on active transport

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call