Abstract

HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections differ in prognosis, and may also require different prevention and/or treatment approaches. Thus, estimating the true prevalence of HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections, as well as co-infections, is a critical step in controlling the disease. There are a few commercial ELISA and immunoblot kits, which can differentiate between HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. However, some of these assays overestimate the prevalence of dual infection. Hence, it is necessary to develop assays capable of discriminating between the two infections. To develop a synthetic HIV-2 env based peptide ELISA for the detection of HIV-2 specific antibodies and evaluate its performance on samples from HIV positive individuals previously tested by HIV-1 and HIV-2 PCR and HIV seronegative individuals. We studied 45 HIV seronegative and 63 HIV infected individuals, including 30 HIV-1 PCR and immunoblot positives, 19 HIV-2 PCR and immunoblot positives, five HIV-1 and two PCR and dual immunoblot positives, two PCR negative but positive for HIV-2 by immunoblot and seven dual immunoblot positives who were only positive for HIV-1 by PCR. All 24 HIV-2 PCR positive samples tested were positive by the peptide assay. Among 30 HIV-1 PCR and immunoblot positive samples, only one (3.3%) showed an absorbance value above the cut off level. The seven dual positive samples by immunoblot (only positive for HIV-1 by PCR) were negative by the HIV-2 peptide ELISA. There was a 100% concordance between HIV-2 PCR and peptide ELISA. The sensitivity, specificity, and the likelihood ratio for the peptide ELISA were 100,94.9, and 19.5, respectively when compared against the PCR findings. This ELISA, using a specific immunodominant epitope (11 amino acids) from the transmembrane (gp36) portion of the HIV-2 envelope glycoprotein showed a high concordance with PCR findings. This can be considered as a highly sensitive, specific and economically feasible assay for the discrimination of HIV-1 and HIV-2, and may serve as an alternative to HIV-2 PCR in epidemiological studies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.