Abstract

Why is quantum mathematics (QM) the only science based on probability amplitudes rather than probabilities? A paradigm shift called the Theory of Elementary Waves (TEW) posits zero energy waves traveling in the opposite direction as particles, which a particle follows backwards: like a probabilistic guidance system emanating from detectors. Probability amplitudes are the mathematical analog of these elementary rays. Although this proposal might sound like gibberish, that is the hallmark of a paradigm shift. Thomas Kuhn warns that previous paradigm shifts were rejected because they sounded like gibberish. TEW is internally coherent, explains a mountain of empirical data, and resolves insoluble problems of QM. For example, it dispenses with the need for wavefunction collapse because probability decisions are made at the particle source, not the detector. It is the only local realistic theory consistent with the Bell test experiments. That which QM calls “nonlocality,” TEW calls “elementary rays.” One term is vague, the other involves elegant mathematics. This article introduces that mathematical notation, explains complementarity in double slit experiments, and reinterprets Feynman diagrams. QM and TEW are partners that need each other. One is a science of observables; the other a science of how nature works independent of the observer.

Highlights

  • We showed that Theory of Elementary Waves (TEW) is a local realistic theory that can explain many of the Bell test experiments

  • Our goal in this article is to outline the mathematics of a new picture of physical nature independent of the observer, one that clears up the mystery described by Binney

  • The difference between in TEW versus quantum mathematics (QM) is that a TEW wave–particle responds to information from the detector ahead, since the detector is the origin of the ray ® embedded inside the identity of the wave particle

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

When you learned quantum math you entered a world of abstractions that have no apparent connection to the physical world around you, except that as you turn the gears “observables” drop out of the machinery, and those “observables” can be taken to the laboratory and verified. This machinery works magnificently for its goal, which is to predict how experiments and technology will perform in the future. When we have finished building the artificial world of TEW, we will leave it to the reader to decide whether that artificial world is one he or she would want to live in and adopt as a new home.

Overview
Our notation and Dirac’s
Symmetry of double slit experiments
Symmetry of TEW and QM pictures of a double slit experiment
Adding helices of different wavelength
Operators
Location of wave interference
Why do electrons act different if we look at them?
What Feynman diagrams tell us about elementary rays
Summary
Limitations of this article
Strengths of this article
Wave particle duality
The history of QM
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call