Abstract
Simple SummaryRadiation-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most toxic and most difficult to repair DNA lesions and are very heterogeneous. These characteristics place considerable demands on the selection of the most suitable repair mechanism at each individual damage site. Here, we review the current knowledge on this still enigmatic process and hypothesize that it critically involves the local chromatin architecture at the micro- and nanoscales, later manifested in the architecture of DSB repair foci (i.e., IRIFs).DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) have been recognized as the most serious lesions in irradiated cells. While several biochemical pathways capable of repairing these lesions have been identified, the mechanisms by which cells select a specific pathway for activation at a given DSB site remain poorly understood. Our knowledge of DSB induction and repair has increased dramatically since the discovery of ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIFs), initiating the possibility of spatiotemporally monitoring the assembly and disassembly of repair complexes in single cells. IRIF exploration revealed that all post-irradiation processes—DSB formation, repair and misrepair—are strongly dependent on the characteristics of DSB damage and the microarchitecture of the whole affected chromatin domain in addition to the cell status. The microscale features of IRIFs, such as their morphology, mobility, spatiotemporal distribution, and persistence kinetics, have been linked to repair mechanisms. However, the influence of various biochemical and structural factors and their specific combinations on IRIF architecture remains unknown, as does the hierarchy of these factors in the decision-making process for a particular repair mechanism at each individual DSB site. New insights into the relationship between the physical properties of the incident radiation, chromatin architecture, IRIF architecture, and DSB repair mechanisms and repair efficiency are expected from recent developments in optical superresolution microscopy (nanoscopy) techniques that have shifted our ability to analyze chromatin and IRIF architectures towards the nanoscale. In the present review, we discuss this relationship, attempt to correlate still rather isolated nanoscale studies with already better-understood aspects of DSB repair at the microscale, and consider whether newly emerging “correlated multiscale structuromics” can revolutionarily enhance our knowledge in this field.
Highlights
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious type of DNA lesion and are induced in DNA by ionizing radiation, radiomimetic chemicals and cellular processes [1,2,3]
Most often reported are alternative nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ), single-strand annealing (SSA), and microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ), which differ in the requirement for some repair proteins, extent of DNA end resection, and length of homology needed for recombination [7,14]
double-strand breaks (DSBs) localized in heterochromatin become more motile due to decondensation of the damaged domain driven by repair processes [75] and eventually form secondary IRIF clusters, generating substrates for illegitimate chromatin exchanges associated with a risk of gene malfunction and further global chromatin rearrangements during cell division
Summary
Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are the most deleterious type of DNA lesion and are induced in DNA by ionizing radiation, radiomimetic chemicals and cellular processes [1,2,3]. Controlled processes seem to offer the possibility of simple and universal regulation of some important steps in DSB repair pathways Consistent with this assumption, ATM, which is required for the repair of heterochromatin in both the G1 and G2 phases of the cell cycle, does not seem to be involved in DSB escape from the heterochromatin domain [55] but rather to participate in the modification of damaged chromatin nanoarchitecture after relocation (discussed later). Supporting the role of chromatin architecture in repair pathway selection and regulation, disruption of damaged chromatin domains by high-LET radiation can facilitate the access of DSB repair proteins to lesions commonly accessible only after decondensation of damaged domains, accelerating HR initiation [122,123] Together, these findings might challenge the model, which states that HR can be activated only after unsuccessful NHEJ [55], provided that NHEJ failure does not occur very soon after irradiation. The first results on this topic are introduced in the chapter
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.