Abstract

Although many studies have examined the influence of women's fertility preferences on subsequent fertility behavior and the role of contraceptive use intentions on unmet need, very few have explored their concurrent effects on contraceptive use dynamics. This study examines the independent concurrent effects of women's fertility preferences and contraceptive intentions on subsequent adoption and discontinuation, treating pregnancy as a competing risk factor that may alter contraceptive need. The data are derived from a 2018 follow-up survey of a 2014 national sample of 3,800 Ugandan female respondents of childbearing age. The survey included a contraceptive calendar that recorded pregnancy, birth, and contraceptive event episodes, including reasons for discontinuation. We use competing risk regression to estimate the effect of fertility preferences and contraceptive intentions on the cumulative incidence function of contraceptive behaviors, accounting for intervening pregnancy, female background covariates, loss to follow-up, and complex survey design. We find that women's contraceptive intentions significantly increase the rate of contraceptive adoption. After having adopted, women's contraceptive intentions have been realized and do not prolong use. The risk of discontinuation among women who adopted after baseline was significantly higher than for those using at baseline, irrespective of their initial intentions. The effectiveness of the type of contraceptive method chosen significantly lowered discontinuation risk. Fertility preferences were not significantly associated with either time to adoption or discontinuation. The pace of the fertility transition in this sub-Saharan African setting is likely being shaped by reproductive regulation through the intentional use of contraception that enables spacing births.

Highlights

  • The fer­tili­ty pref­er­ences of wom­en, as mea­sured by their de­sired fam­ily size and in­ten­tion to limit or de­lay child­bear­ing, have been the sub­ject of con­tin­u­ous study since the 1970s for their pred­ ic­tive validity of sub­se­quent child­bear­ing (Bankole and ELECTRONIC SUP­PLE­MEN­TARY MA­TE­RI­AL The online ver­sion of this ar­ti­cle contains supplementary material.Westoff 1998; Cleland et al 2020; Hayford and Agadjanian 2017; Mor­gan 1982; Vlassoff 1990; Westoff 1990; Westoff and Ryder 1977)

  • With tran­si­tions from high to low fer­tili­ty nearly com­plete in all­ reg­ ions of the world out­side of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), re­search is in­creas­ingly foc­ used on un­der­stand­ing how fer­tili­ty pref­er­ ences are tem­po­rally rel­ated to the pace of fert­ili­ty dec­ line, as ei­ther a de­ter­mi­nant or a pre­cur­sor (Bongaarts and Casterline 2018)

  • The au­thors spec­u­lated that the strength of the as­so­ci­at­ion is re­lated to how well pref­er­ences are implemented by cont­ra­cep­tive use

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In high-in­come countries, re­search­ers have used data from na­tional lon­gi­tu­di­nal sur­veys of women and men (e.­g., Rackin and Mor­gan [2018] for the United States; Iacovou and Tavares [2011] for the United Kingdom) to study fert­ili­ty ex­pec­ta­tions and their achievem­ ent across birth co­horts, but else­where such in­sights are constrained by a re­li­ance on cross-sec­tional sur­vey data (e.­g., Westoff and Bankole 2002). A re­cent re­view of lon­gi­tu­di­nal stud­ies of fer­ tili­ty pref­er­ences and sub­se­quent child­bear­ing in Asia and Africa by Cleland et al (2020) found cov­er­age of only 28 pop­u­la­tions since 1967, many of them sub­na­tional (23), more of them in Asia (19) than in Africa (9), and tak­ing place over in­ter­vals rang­ing from 2 to 12 years. The au­thors spec­u­lated that the strength of the as­so­ci­at­ion is re­lated to how well pref­er­ences are implemented by cont­ra­cep­tive use

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.