Abstract

BackgroundMen with a negative first prostate biopsy will undergo one or more additional biopsies if they remain at high suspicion of prostate cancer. To date, there are no diagnostic tests capable of identifying patients at risk for a positive diagnosis with the predictive power needed to eliminate unnecessary repeat biopsies. Efforts to develop clinical tests using the epigenetic signature of cores recovered from first biopsies have been limited to a few markers and lack the sensitivity and specificity needed for widespread clinical adoption.MethodsWe developed methylation-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays for a panel of 24 markers that are preferentially methylated in prostate cancer. We modified the bisulfite conversion conditions to allow the integration of the methylation information from multiple markers. We determined the methylation status of the 24 markers in 213 prostate biopsy cores from 104 patients, 37 prostate cancer patients and 67 controls. We performed logistic regression on combinations of markers as well as the entire panel of 24 markers to identify the best candidates for a diagnostic test.ResultsThe marker panel differentiated between cancer cores and benign cores from non-cancer patients with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Furthermore, the panel detected significant methylation in benign cores from prostate cancer patients that was not present in controls. Using methylation of 5 out of 24 to define a cancer case, the analysis of a single benign biopsy core identified 62% of prostate cancer patients undergoing repeat biopsies. ROC curve analysis showed that markers commonly methylated in benign cores from cancer patients are the best candidates for a diagnostic test. The results suggest that 5 to 10 markers will be needed to achieve optimal predictive power.ConclusionsThis study shows that epigenetic field effects differ significantly between cancer patients and controls. Their detection in benign biopsy cores can form the basis of diagnostic tests to identify patients in need of repeat biopsies, reducing the cost of continued PCA screening by up to 40%. They could also be used to identify prostate cancer patients with low grade disease who are likely candidates for active surveillance or focal therapy.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40364-014-0025-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Men with a negative first prostate biopsy will undergo one or more additional biopsies if they remain at high suspicion of prostate cancer

  • Patients at high suspicion of cancer following a first negative biopsy present a challenge to the treating physician who needs to balance the morbidity associated with repeat biopsies with the risk of missing what might be a significant cancer [12,13,14]

  • None of the controls underwent an additional biopsy at the end of the study to rule out the presence of prostate cancer

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Men with a negative first prostate biopsy will undergo one or more additional biopsies if they remain at high suspicion of prostate cancer. There are no diagnostic tests capable of identifying patients at risk for a positive diagnosis with the predictive power needed to eliminate unnecessary repeat biopsies. Patients at high suspicion of cancer following a first negative biopsy present a challenge to the treating physician who needs to balance the morbidity associated with repeat biopsies with the risk of missing what might be a significant cancer [12,13,14]. We still lack diagnostic methods capable of identifying patients with a negative first biopsy who are in need of a repeat biopsy with the sensitivity and specificity needed to spare non cancer patients the burden of repeat biopsies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call