Abstract
To make plasma readily available to treat major hemorrhage, some centers are internationally using either thawed plasma (TP) or "never-frozen" liquid plasma (LP). Despite the routine use of both, there are limited data comparing the two. The hemostatic properties of LP were evaluated and compared to TP in a paired study. Two ABO-matched plasma units were pooled and split to produce 1 unit for LP and 1 unit for TP. Samples of TP and LP, stored at 2 to 6°C, were tested for a range of coagulation factors, thrombin generation, and rotational thromboelastometry. An additional 119 units of LP were collected and analyzed for markers of contact activation (S-2302 cleavage) and cellular content. LP and TP were compared, up to 7 days of storage, with results showing no difference in the rate of change over time for any variable measured. When compared to Day5, LP on Day7 showed no difference for any factors measured; however, on Day11 Factor (F)II, FV, FVII, and protein S (activity) were lower. Analysis of 119 LP units showed that 26 of 119 (22%) exhibited cold-induced contact activation by Day28. LP and TP were comparable in terms of hemostatic variables up to 7 days of storage. Decreasing coagulation factor activity along with an increased activation risk during storage of LP needs to be balanced against availability to supply and clinical need when considering using LP with more than 7 days of storage.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.