Abstract
As a nonmuscular communication and control system for people with severe motor disabilities, brain–computer interface (BCI) has found several applications. Although a few empirical studies of BCI user performance do exist, little to no research has specifically evaluated the impact of contributing factors on user performance in the BCI applications. To that end, our within-subjects design compared the impact of two different types of interface (ABC interface vs. frequency-based interface) and three levels of screen size (computer monitor, global positioning system, and cell phone screen) of a P300-based BCI application, P300 Speller, on user performance (accuracy, information transfer rate, amplitude, and latency) and usage preference. Ten participants with neuromuscular disabilities such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cerebral palsy and 10 nondisabled participants were asked to type six, 10-character phrases in the P300 Speller. The overall accuracy was 79.7% for the nondisabled participants and 28.7% for participants with motor disabilities. The results showed that interface type and screen size have significant effects on user performance and usage preference, with varying degree of impact to participants with and without motor disabilities. Specifically, participants typed significantly more accurately in frequency-based interface and computer monitor screen. The results of this study should provide invaluable insights to the future research of P300-based BCI applications.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have